|
9059
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Технологии
Технологии
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет по медна свързаност
Интернет по медна свързаност
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
ПОДАРЪК проектор при поръчка на нова услуга онлайн
ПОДАРЪК проектор
при поръчка на
нова услуга онлайн
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026 Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026
Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
Офертата не важи при преподписване на съществуващ договор.
Голям екран. Ярка картина. SMART стрийминг.
Голям екран.
Ярка картина.
SMART стрийминг.
Гледай филми, спорт и видеа директно от проектора. Идеален за домa – дори при по-светли помещения. Безжично прехвърляш екрана от телефона – за секунди.
EON App за смарт телевизор EON със смарт бокс приемник
EON App за смарт телевизор
EON със смарт
бокс приемник
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON LIGHT
EON LIGHT
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори - отвори в нов раздел
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
10 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
10 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
120+ /75+ HD канала
120+ /75+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 200 Mbps за download до 100 Mbps за upload
до
200 Mbps
за download
до 100 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
19.90€
|
38.92лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
EON FULL
EON FULL
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори - отвори в нов раздел
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
20 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
20 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
180+ /100+ HD канала
180+ /100+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1, Marquee TV
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 600 Mbps за download до 400 Mbps за upload
до
600 Mbps
за download
до 400 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
22.90€
|
44.79лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
EON PREMIUM
EON PREMIUM
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори - отвори в нов раздел
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
30 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
30 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
225+ /130+ HD канала
225+ /130+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Arena Select, HBO, Diema Xtra, MAX Sport Plus, Pickbox 1, Marquee TV, 7/8 TV
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 2 Gbps за download до 1 Gbps за upload
до
2 Gbps
за download
до 1 Gbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
41.90€
|
81.95лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Повече информация:
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
ПРЕДИМСТВА
ПРЕДИМСТВА
Вълнуващо съдържание за всеки
Супер бърз интернет
Неограничена комуникация
Пауза на програмата на живо
ЕКШЪН – АДРЕНАЛИН – ВЪЛНЕНИЕ
ЕКШЪН – АДРЕНАЛИН – ВЪЛНЕНИЕ
Arena Select - Заяви бързо и лесно в My Vivacom
DiemaXtra DiemaXtra Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място
DiemaXtra
DiemaXtra
Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място
SkyShowtime гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали. SkyShowtime Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали.
SkyShowtime
SkyShowtime
Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали.
HBO Max - С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max HBO С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max.
HBO
HBO
С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max.
Go to slide 1
Go to slide 2
ДОПЪЛНИТЕЛНИ ПАКЕТИ ЗА ТВОЯТА ЕON ТЕЛЕВИЗИЯ
Добави още канали, предавания, филми, документални филми към твоя телевизионен пакет.
SkyShowtime
Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали. Събери цялото семейство с любимите детски анимации, вдъхнови се от истории по истински случаи и се наслади на холивудски хитове.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
4.99 € | 9.76 лв.
/мес.
Arena Select
Arena Select включва каналите Arena Action, Arena Comedy, Arena Life в един пакет с ексклузивно съдържание, лимитирани сериали, премиум филми, документални поредици и риалити формати, подбрани така че винаги да има какво да гледаш с интерес.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
1.00 € | 1.96 лв.
/мес.
DiemaXtra
Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място. Мачове на живо в HD качество, NBA, квалификации и състезания от най-авторитетното автомобилно състезание в света – Formula 1.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
7.66 € | 14.99 лв.
/мес.
MAX Sport Plus
Уникална комбинация от спортни надпревари, най-вълнуващите футболни мачове от УЕФА Шампионска лига, испанската La Liga, италианската Серия А, холандското футболно първенство „Ередивизи“, Copa Libertadores и най-престижните тенис турнири.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
HBO
В HBO HD, HBO 2 HD, HBO 3 HD те очакват ексклузивни премиери на сериали и хитови предложения от света на киното.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
6.64 € | 12.99лв.
/мес.
7/8 TV
Независима журналистика, актуални информационни и аналитични предавания, богат набор от забавни и музикални програми.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
0.40 € | 0.78 лв.
/мес.
Pickbox NOW
Премиум световни и европейски продукции с български субтитри ексклузивно в Pickbox NOW.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
Oh!Jazz
Твоето място на първи ред в света на джаза
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
8.69 € | 16.99 лв.
/мес.
Marquee TV
Богата и разнообразна библиотека със съдържание, което включва театър, балет, опера, класическа, документални филми и още много други.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
8.69 € | 16.99 лв.
/мес.
Arena Play
Избирате от внушителна видеотека и гледате в удобно за вас време.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
2.91 € | 5.70 лв.
/мес.
Da Vinci OD
Стимулирайте ума си с Da Vinci – с вдъхновяващи предавания, документални филми и сериали и художествени поредици за любознателни зрители.
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
MyBabyTV On Demand
Стимулирайте ума си с Da Vinci – с вдъхновяващи предавания, документални филми и сериали и художествени поредици за любознателни зрители.
2.04 € | 3.99 лв.
/мес.
Тематичен пакет 1
Най-популярните руски канали. Вълнуваща продукция от забавни предавания, руски сериали и информационни програми.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
1.74 € | 3.40 лв.
/мес.
Тематичен пакет 2
Най-популярните турски канали. Очакват те турски сериали и продукции, информационни програми.
Виж повече - отвори в нов раздел
Виж повече
1.74 € | 3.40 лв.
/мес.
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON LIGHT
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON FULL
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON PREMIUM
Национални
Виж всички
Виж всички
БНТ 1 HD БНТ 1 HD
БНТ 1 HD
bTV HD bTV HD
bTV HD
Nova HD Nova HD
Nova HD
Nova News HD Nova News HD
Nova News HD
BG On Air HD BG On Air HD
BG On Air HD
Euronews Bulgaria HD Euronews Bulgaria HD
Euronews Bulgaria HD
Международни
Виж всички
Виж всички
CNN CNN
CNN
FREEDOM FREEDOM
FREEDOM
DW DW
DW
Peretz Int. Peretz Int.
Peretz Int.
K::CN K::CN
K::CN
K::CN 3 K::CN 3
K::CN 3
Филмови
Виж всички
Виж всички
bTV Comedy HD bTV Comedy HD
bTV Comedy HD
bTV Cinema HD bTV Cinema HD
bTV Cinema HD
bTV Action HD bTV Action HD
bTV Action HD
Diema HD Diema HD
Diema HD
Кино Нова HD Кино Нова HD
Кино Нова HD
VIVACOM Arena HD VIVACOM Arena HD
VIVACOM Arena HD
Спортни
Виж всички
Виж всички
Nova Sport HD Nova Sport HD
Nova Sport HD
Eurosport HD Eurosport HD
Eurosport HD
Eurosport 2 HD Eurosport 2 HD
Eurosport 2 HD
Eurosport 4K Eurosport 4K
Eurosport 4K
KHL KHL
KHL
RING HD RING HD
RING HD
Документални
Виж всички
Виж всички
National Geographic HD National Geographic HD
National Geographic HD
Discovery Channel HD Discovery Channel HD
Discovery Channel HD
History HD History HD
History HD
Viasat History HD Viasat History HD
Viasat History HD
Viasat Explore HD Viasat Explore HD
Viasat Explore HD
Animal Planet HD Animal Planet HD
Animal Planet HD
Музикални
Виж всички
Виж всички
Планета ТВ HD Планета ТВ HD
Планета ТВ HD
FEN HD FEN HD
FEN HD
Grand Grand
Grand
Hit Mix HD Hit Mix HD
Hit Mix HD
DSTV DSTV
DSTV
Grand 2 Grand 2
Grand 2
Детски
Виж всички
Виж всички
Nickelodeon Nickelodeon
Nickelodeon...
|
Firefox
|
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/eon/eon-paketi
|
9059
|
|
9680
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
ПОДАРЪК проектор при поръчка на нова услуга онлайн
ПОДАРЪК проектор
при поръчка на
нова услуга онлайн
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026 Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026
Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
Офертата не важи при преподписване на съществуващ договор.
Голям екран. Ярка картина. SMART стрийминг....
|
Firefox
|
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/eon/eon-paketi
|
9680
|
|
9681
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
ПОДАРЪК проектор при поръчка на нова услуга онлайн
ПОДАРЪК проектор
при поръчка на
нова услуга онлайн
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026 Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026
Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
Офертата не важи при преподписване на съществуващ договор.
Голям екран. Ярка картина. SMART стрийминг.
Голям екран.
Ярка картина.
SMART стрийминг.
Гледай филми, спорт и видеа директно от проектора. Идеален за домa – дори при по-светли помещения. Безжично прехвърляш екрана от телефона – за секунди.
EON App за смарт телевизор EON със смарт бокс приемник
EON App за смарт телевизор
EON със смарт
бокс приемник
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON LIGHT
EON LIGHT
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
10 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
10 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
120+ /75+ HD канала
120+ /75+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 200 Mbps за download до 100 Mbps за upload
до
200 Mbps
за download
до 100 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
19.90€
|
38.92лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
EON FULL
EON FULL
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
20 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
20 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
180+ /100+ HD канала
180+ /100+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1, Marquee TV
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 600 Mbps за download до 400 Mbps за upload
до
600 Mbps
за download
до 400 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
22.90€
|
44.79лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие...
|
Firefox
|
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/eon/eon-paketi
|
9681
|
|
9682
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
ПОДАРЪК проектор при поръчка на нова услуга онлайн
ПОДАРЪК проектор
при поръчка на
нова услуга онлайн
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026 Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
С всяка онлайн поръчка за нова услуга - пакет EON + интернет до 31.05.2026
Получаваш подарък SMART преносим проектор XMART MPP-40
Офертата не важи при преподписване на съществуващ договор.
Голям екран. Ярка картина. SMART стрийминг.
Голям екран.
Ярка картина.
SMART стрийминг.
Гледай филми, спорт и видеа директно от проектора. Идеален за домa – дори при по-светли помещения. Безжично прехвърляш екрана от телефона – за секунди.
EON App за смарт телевизор EON със смарт бокс приемник
EON App за смарт телевизор
EON със смарт
бокс приемник
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON ПАКЕТИ
EON LIGHT
EON LIGHT
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
10 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
10 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
120+ /75+ HD канала
120+ /75+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 200 Mbps за download до 100 Mbps за upload
до
200 Mbps
за download
до 100 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
19.90€
|
38.92лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
EON FULL
EON FULL
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
20 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
20 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
180+ /100+ HD канала
180+ /100+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Pickbox 1, Marquee TV
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 600 Mbps за download до 400 Mbps за upload
до
600 Mbps
за download
до 400 Mbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
22.90€
|
44.79лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
EON PREMIUM
EON PREMIUM
TV
EON смарт бокс
EON смарт бокс
EON Smart TV приложение
EON Smart TV приложение
препоръчани Smart телевизори
препоръчани Smart телевизори
Мобилно приложение EON
Мобилно приложение EON
30 000+ заглавия в EON Видеотека
30 000+
заглавия в EON Видеотека
225+ /130+ HD канала
225+ /130+ HD канала
VIVACOM Arena, Arena Select, HBO, Diema Xtra, MAX Sport Plus, Pickbox 1, Marquee TV, 7/8 TV
ОПТИЧЕН ИНТЕРНЕТ
до 2 Gbps за download до 1 Gbps за upload
до
2 Gbps
за download
до 1 Gbps за upload
Повече детайли
Повече детайли
41.90€
|
81.95лв.
/мес.
Провери покритие Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Провери покритие
Повече информация:
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
ПРЕДИМСТВА
ПРЕДИМСТВА
Вълнуващо съдържание за всеки
Супер бърз интернет
Неограничена комуникация
Пауза на програмата на живо
ЕКШЪН – АДРЕНАЛИН – ВЪЛНЕНИЕ
ЕКШЪН – АДРЕНАЛИН – ВЪЛНЕНИЕ
Arena Select - Заяви бързо и лесно в My Vivacom
DiemaXtra Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място
DiemaXtra
DiemaXtra
Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място
SkyShowtime гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали. SkyShowtime Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали.
SkyShowtime
SkyShowtime
Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали.
HBO Max - С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max HBO С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max.
HBO
HBO
С включен достъп до HBO On Demand и HBO Max.
Go to slide 1
Go to slide 2
ДОПЪЛНИТЕЛНИ ПАКЕТИ ЗА ТВОЯТА ЕON ТЕЛЕВИЗИЯ
Добави още канали, предавания, филми, документални филми към твоя телевизионен пакет.
SkyShowtime
Гмурни се в безкрайно забавление с уникална колекция от ексклузивни филми и сериали. Събери цялото семейство с любимите детски анимации, вдъхнови се от истории по истински случаи и се наслади на холивудски хитове.
Виж повече
Виж повече
4.99 € | 9.76 лв.
/мес.
Arena Select
Arena Select включва каналите Arena Action, Arena Comedy, Arena Life в един пакет с ексклузивно съдържание, лимитирани сериали, премиум филми, документални поредици и риалити формати, подбрани така че винаги да има какво да гледаш с интерес.
Виж повече
Виж повече
1.00 € | 1.96 лв.
/мес.
DiemaXtra
Най-доброто от световния спорт на едно място. Мачове на живо в HD качество, NBA, квалификации и състезания от най-авторитетното автомобилно състезание в света – Formula 1.
Виж повече
Виж повече
7.66 € | 14.99 лв.
/мес.
MAX Sport Plus
Уникална комбинация от спортни надпревари, най-вълнуващите футболни мачове от УЕФА Шампионска лига, испанската La Liga, италианската Серия А, холандското футболно първенство „Ередивизи“, Copa Libertadores и най-престижните тенис турнири.
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
HBO
В HBO HD, HBO 2 HD, HBO 3 HD те очакват ексклузивни премиери на сериали и хитови предложения от света на киното.
Виж повече
Виж повече
6.64 € | 12.99лв.
/мес.
7/8 TV
Независима журналистика, актуални информационни и аналитични предавания, богат набор от забавни и музикални програми.
Виж повече
Виж повече
0.40 € | 0.78 лв.
/мес.
Pickbox NOW
Премиум световни и европейски продукции с български субтитри ексклузивно в Pickbox NOW.
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
Oh!Jazz
Твоето място на първи ред в света на джаза
Виж повече
Виж повече
8.69 € | 16.99 лв.
/мес.
Marquee TV
Богата и разнообразна библиотека със съдържание, което включва театър, балет, опера, класическа, документални филми и още много други.
Виж повече
Виж повече
8.69 € | 16.99 лв.
/мес.
Arena Play
Избирате от внушителна видеотека и гледате в удобно за вас време.
Виж повече
Виж повече
2.91 € | 5.70 лв.
/мес.
Da Vinci OD
Стимулирайте ума си с Da Vinci – с вдъхновяващи предавания, документални филми и сериали и художествени поредици за любознателни зрители.
5.11 € | 9.99 лв.
/мес.
MyBabyTV On Demand
Стимулирайте ума си с Da Vinci – с вдъхновяващи предавания, документални филми и сериали и художествени поредици за любознателни зрители.
2.04 € | 3.99 лв.
/мес.
Тематичен пакет 1
Най-популярните руски канали. Вълнуваща продукция от забавни предавания, руски сериали и информационни програми.
Виж повече
Виж повече
1.74 € | 3.40 лв.
/мес.
Тематичен пакет 2
Най-популярните турски канали. Очакват те турски сериали и продукции, информационни програми.
Виж повече
Виж повече
1.74 € | 3.40 лв.
/мес.
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON LIGHT
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON FULL
СПИСЪК С КАНАЛИ EON PREMIUM
Национални
Виж всички
Виж всички
БНТ 1 HD БНТ 1 HD
БНТ 1 HD
bTV HD bTV HD
bTV HD
Nova HD Nova HD
Nova HD
Nova News HD Nova News HD
Nova News HD
BG On Air HD BG On Air HD
BG On Air HD
Euronews Bulgaria HD Euronews Bulgaria HD
Euronews Bulgaria HD
Международни
Виж всички
Виж всички
CNN CNN
CNN
FREEDOM FREEDOM
FREEDOM
DW DW
DW
Peretz Int. Peretz Int.
Peretz Int.
K::CN K::CN
K::CN
K::CN 3 K::CN 3
K::CN 3
Филмови
Виж всички
Виж всички
bTV Comedy HD bTV Comedy HD
bTV Comedy HD
bTV Cinema HD bTV Cinema HD
bTV Cinema HD
bTV Action HD bTV Action HD
bTV Action HD
Diema HD Diema HD
Diema HD
Кино Нова HD Кино Нова HD
Кино Нова HD
VIVACOM Arena HD VIVACOM Arena HD
VIVACOM Arena HD
Спортни
Виж всички
Виж всички
Nova Sport HD Nova Sport HD
Nova Sport HD
Eurosport HD Eurosport HD
Eurosport HD
Eurosport 2 HD Eurosport 2 HD
Eurosport 2 HD
Eurosport 4K Eurosport 4K
Eurosport 4K
KHL KHL
KHL
RING HD RING HD
RING HD
Документални
Виж всички
Виж всички
National Geographic HD National Geographic HD
National Geographic HD
Discovery Channel HD Discovery Channel HD
Discovery Channel HD
History HD History HD
History HD
Viasat History HD Viasat History HD
Viasat History HD
Viasat Explore HD Viasat Explore HD
Viasat Explore HD
Animal Planet HD Animal Planet HD
Animal Planet HD
Музикални
Виж всички
Виж всички
Планета ТВ HD Планета ТВ HD
Планета ТВ HD
FEN HD FEN HD
FEN HD
Grand Grand
Grand
Hit Mix HD Hit Mix HD
Hit Mix HD
DSTV DSTV
DSTV
Grand 2 Grand 2
Grand 2
Детски
Виж всички
Виж всички
Nickelodeon Nickelodeon
Nickelodeon
Disney Disney
Disney
Cartoon Network Cartoon Network
Cartoon Network
Cartoonito Cartoonito
Cartoonito
Super toons HD Super toons HD
Super toons HD
Nicktoons Nicktoons
Nicktoons...
|
Firefox
|
EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | EON пакети – TV платформа и супер бърз интернет | Vivacom — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/eon/eon-paketi
|
9682
|
|
9012
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9012
|
|
9013
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
EON Light TV с договор
EON Light TV с договор
СА EON LIGHT OTT ¦ 12.90€ 25.23лв (24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Общо сума на месец
EON Light TV с договор
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Общо
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9013
|
|
9014
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
EON Light TV с договор
EON Light TV с договор
СА EON LIGHT OTT ¦ 12.90€ 25.23лв (24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Общо сума на месец
EON Light TV с договор
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Общо
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Допълнителни пакети
Може да харесаш и тези
Може да харесаш и тези
HBO 6.64€ | 12.99 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
HBO
HBO
6.64
€
|
12.99
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
DiemaXtra 7.66€ | 14.98 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
DiemaXtra
DiemaXtra
7.66
€
|
14.98
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
MAX Sport Plus 5.11€ | 9.99 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
MAX Sport Plus
MAX Sport Plus
5.11
€
|
9.99
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Arena Select 1.00€ | 1.96 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Arena Select
Arena Select
1.00
€
|
1.96
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
SkyShowtime 3.99€ | 7.80 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
SkyShowtime
SkyShowtime
3.99
€
|
7.80
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски) 1.74€ | 3.40 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски)
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски)
1.74
€
|
3.40
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски) 1.74€ | 3.40 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски)
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски)
1.74
€
|
3.40
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8) 0.40€ | 0.78 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8)
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8)
0.40
€
|
0.78
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Go to slide 1
Go to slide 2
Go to slide 3
Go to slide 4
Go to slide 5
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9014
|
|
9015
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Технологии
Технологии
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет по медна свързаност
Интернет по медна свързаност
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
EON Light TV с договор
EON Light TV с договор
СА EON LIGHT OTT ¦ 12.90€ 25.23лв (24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Общо сума на месец
EON Light TV с договор
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Общо
12.90
€
|
25.23
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Допълнителни пакети
Може да харесаш и тези
Може да харесаш и тези
HBO 6.64€ | 12.99 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
HBO
HBO
6.64
€
|
12.99
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
DiemaXtra 7.66€ | 14.98 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
DiemaXtra
DiemaXtra
7.66
€
|
14.98
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
MAX Sport Plus 5.11€ | 9.99 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
MAX Sport Plus
MAX Sport Plus
5.11
€
|
9.99
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Arena Select 1.00€ | 1.96 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Arena Select
Arena Select
1.00
€
|
1.96
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
SkyShowtime 3.99€ | 7.80 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
SkyShowtime
SkyShowtime
3.99
€
|
7.80
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски) 1.74€ | 3.40 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски)
Тематичен пакет 1 (Руски)
1.74
€
|
3.40
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски) 1.74€ | 3.40 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски)
Тематичен пакет 2 (Турски)
1.74
€
|
3.40
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8) 0.40€ | 0.78 лв./мес. Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8)
Тематичен пакет 3 (7/8)
0.40
€
|
0.78
лв.
/мес.
Добави в кошницата Добави в кошницата...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9015
|
|
9016
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9016
|
|
9044
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
vivacom.bg/basket
vivacom.bg/basket
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
Google app
App store
Huawei store
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group
Waiting for www.google.com…...
|
Firefox
|
Personal — Mozilla Firefox
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9044
|
|
9045
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Твоята количка е празна.
Разгледай нашите оферти и открий подходящата за теб!
Начална страница
Начална страница
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
Google app
App store
Huawei store
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group
Отворена джаджа за чат...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9045
|
|
9046
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
Google app
App store
Huawei store
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9046
|
|
9047
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
google app - целевият уебсайт може да не е наличен
App store - отвори в нов раздел
Huawei store - отвори в нов раздел
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group - отвори в нов раздел
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9047
|
|
9048
|
EON
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub EON
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
EON планове
EON планове
EON пакети TV и интернет
EON пакети TV и интернет
EON SAT TV
EON SAT TV
EON TV
EON TV
EON TV без договор
EON TV без договор
Всичко за EON
Всичко за EON
Защо EON?
Защо EON?
EON Видеотека
EON Видеотека
EON Мобилно приложение
EON Мобилно приложение
EON Устройства
EON Устройства
Помощ
Помощ
Технологии
Технологии
EON SAT пакети
EON SAT пакети
EON 5G пакети
EON 5G пакети
Arena
Arena
Arena канали
Arena канали
Arena Select
Arena Select
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
google app - целевият уебсайт може да не е наличен
App store - отвори в нов раздел
Huawei store - отвори в нов раздел
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group - отвори в нов раздел
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget
javascript:void(0)...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9048
|
|
9049
|
EON
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub EON
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
EON планове
EON планове
EON пакети TV и интернет
EON пакети TV и интернет
EON SAT TV
EON SAT TV
EON TV
EON TV
EON TV без договор
EON TV без договор
Всичко за EON
Всичко за EON
Защо EON?
Защо EON?
EON Видеотека
EON Видеотека
EON Мобилно приложение
EON Мобилно приложение
EON Устройства
EON Устройства
Помощ
Помощ
Технологии
Технологии
EON SAT пакети
EON SAT пакети
EON 5G пакети
EON 5G пакети
Arena
Arena
Arena канали
Arena канали
Arena Select
Arena Select
Интернет
Интернет
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9049
|
|
9050
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Технологии
Технологии
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет по медна свързаност
Интернет по медна свързаност
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
google app - целевият уебсайт може да не е наличен
App store - отвори в нов раздел
Huawei store - отвори в нов раздел
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group - отвори в нов раздел
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9050
|
|
9051
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Технологии
Технологии
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет по медна свързаност
Интернет по медна свързаност
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
google app - целевият уебсайт може да не е наличен
App store - отвори в нов раздел
Huawei store - отвори в нов раздел
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group - отвори в нов раздел
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget
javascript:void(0)...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9051
|
|
9052
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
Vivacom Logo
Мобилни услуги
Мобилни услуги
Устройства
Устройства
EON
EON
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет и TV пакети
Интернет
Интернет
Всичко за Интернета
Всичко за Интернета
GIGA мрежа
GIGA мрежа
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi Mesh
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Wi-Fi 7 FTTR
Технологии
Технологии
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет за отдалечени места
Интернет по медна свързаност
Интернет по медна свързаност
Други услуги
Други услуги
Помощ
Помощ
Cart
Моята кошница
Моята кошница
Close
4G Mobix XL
4G Mobix XL
СА Mobix XL ¦ 10.54€ 20.62лв ¦ 5.75€ 11.25лв за 4М ¦ 11.50€ 22.49лв (5-24М)
24 месеца
Виж повече
Виж повече
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
/мес.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
/мес.
Информация за поръчката
Информация за поръчката
Спестяваш
23.00
€
|
44.98
лв.
Общо сума на месец
4G Mobix XL
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Общо плащане на месец
за първите 4 месеца
5.75
€
|
11.25
лв.
след 4 месеца
11.50
€
|
22.49
лв.
Плащаш сега
Общо
0.00
€
|
0.00
лв.
Поръчай Поръчай
Поръчай
Поръчай
Имаш клиентски профил? Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Имаш клиентски профил?
Компанията
Компанията
За нас
За нас
Етика и съответствие
Етика и съответствие
Марката Vivacom
Марката Vivacom
Мениджмънт
Мениджмънт
Социална отговорност
Социална отговорност
Новини
Новини
Кариери
Кариери
Доставчици
Доставчици
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Доклад за устойчиво развитие
Частни клиенти
Частни клиенти
Мобилни планове
Мобилни планове
Мобилен интернет
Мобилен интернет
Устройства
Устройства
Интернет пакети
Интернет пакети
Програма Лоялен клиент
Програма Лоялен клиент
Правила и условия
Правила и условия
Общи условия
Общи условия
Мобилно покритие
Мобилно покритие
Лични данни
Лични данни
Правила за ползване
Правила за ползване
Роуминг
Роуминг
Политика за бисквитките
Политика за бисквитките
Полезни връзки
Полезни връзки
Устройство в сервиз
Устройство в сервиз
Спешни номера
Спешни номера
Активиране на EON TV
Активиране на EON TV
Настройки на CA модул
Настройки на CA модул
Застраховки
Застраховки
Планове за хора с увреждания
Планове за хора с увреждания
Достъпност на сайта
Достъпност на сайта
Електронни фактури
Електронни фактури
EUR BGN
Валутен курс: 1 EUR = 1.95583 лв.
© VIVACOM 2026
google app - целевият уебсайт може да не е наличен
App store - отвори в нов раздел
Huawei store - отвори в нов раздел
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
Instagram
Linkedin
United group - отвори в нов раздел
Отворена джаджа за чат
1
Open CMP widget...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в Бълга Vivacom - 5G мрежата с най-голямо покритие в България | EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg/basket
|
9052
|
|
9007
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Използваме „бисквитки“ (cookies), за да персонализираме съдържанието и рекламите, да предоставяме функции на социални медии и да анализираме трафика си. Също така споделяме информация за начина, по който използвате сайта ни, с партньорските си социални медии, рекламните си партньори и партньори за анализ, които може да я комбинират с друга предоставена им от Вас информация или с такава, която са събрали от ползването от Ваша страна на услугите им. Молим да направите своя избор, след като се запознаете с детайлната информация за различните категории „бисквитки“ (cookies).
Настройки
Настройки
Позволи всички бисквитки
Персонализация
Персонализация
Само строго необходимите бисквитки
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и инте Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg
|
9007
|
|
9008
|
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pul Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Използваме „бисквитки“ (cookies), за да персонализираме съдържанието и рекламите, да предоставяме функции на социални медии и да анализираме трафика си. Също така споделяме информация за начина, по който използвате сайта ни, с партньорските си социални медии, рекламните си партньори и партньори за анализ, които може да я комбинират с друга предоставена им от Вас информация или с такава, която са събрали от ползването от Ваша страна на услугите им. Молим да направите своя избор, след като се запознаете с детайлната информация за различните категории „бисквитки“ (cookies).
Настройки
Настройки
Позволи всички бисквитки
Персонализация
Персонализация
Само строго необходимите бисквитки
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и инте Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg
|
9008
|
|
9009
|
EON пакети TV и интернет
Pull requests · screenpip EON пакети TV и интернет
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Pull requests · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
Home | Hostinger
Home | Hostinger
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Login – Nginx Proxy Manager
Screenpipe — Archive
Screenpipe — Archive
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: archive.db
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
SQLite Web: db.sqlite
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
screenpipe/.claude/skills at main · screenpipe/screenpipe · GitHub
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
DXP4800PLUS-B5F8
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
Bitwarden
Премини към основното съдържание
Активиране на достъпност за хора със слабо зрение
Отворете менюто за достъпност
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Настоящият сайт използва бисквитки
Използваме „бисквитки“ (cookies), за да персонализираме съдържанието и рекламите, да предоставяме функции на социални медии и да анализираме трафика си. Също така споделяме информация за начина, по който използвате сайта ни, с партньорските си социални медии, рекламните си партньори и партньори за анализ, които може да я комбинират с друга предоставена им от Вас информация или с такава, която са събрали от ползването от Ваша страна на услугите им. Молим да направите своя избор, след като се запознаете с детайлната информация за различните категории „бисквитки“ (cookies).
Настройки
Настройки
Позволи всички бисквитки
Персонализация
Персонализация
Само строго необходимите бисквитки
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
ЧАСТНИ КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
БИЗНЕС КЛИЕНТИ
МАГАЗИНИ
МАГАЗИНИ
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
ГЛЕДАЙ EON
КОНТАКТИ
КОНТАКТИ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
ОБЩИ УСЛОВИЯ
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО
КАРТИ НА ПОКРИТИЕТО...
|
Firefox
|
Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и инте Vivacom - 5G мобилни планове, телевизия EON и интернет — Personal...
|
www.vivacom.bg
|
9009
|
|
33392
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Sound interesting can you please share your detail code workflow?
1
Metadata for Agile_Chest8565's comment
Agile_Chest8565's profile --- avatar
Agile_Chest8565's profile
Agile_Chest8565
15d ago
15d ago
In my experience it is amazing for quickly scanning the codebase and gaining context. And getting tasks done fast. Some times a task will be done faster than you can copy and paste a block of text into another terminal. Talking like less than 5 seconds. My only gripe is I find it forgets things / is not as thorough as other models. I use qwen 3.6 and it is much smarter in general, but pretty slow. So I’ll plan and debug and fix things with qwen as needed. But if I use swe 1.6 to implement something, it usual gets about 90% of the way there but misses features or causes small bugs. It works best with good instructions and a plan.
1
Metadata for masterchiefdevil's comment
masterchiefdevil's profile --- avatar
masterchiefdevil's profile
masterchiefdevil
15d ago
15d ago
For me has been an excellent model.
1
Metadata for nian2326076's comment
nian2326076's profile --- avatar
nian2326076's profile
nian2326076
15d ago
15d ago
I haven't used SWE 1.6 a lot, but from what I've heard, it's pretty good for engineering tasks. It usually generates cleaner code with less "code smell" compared to some other AIs. It seems to focus more on creating maintainable code, which might help cut down on bloat and save time over time. If you're switching from GPT 5.4 or Codex, you might notice a difference in code quality. It might not be perfect, but it could be a good alternative given your concerns. Trying it out on a small project could give you a better idea of how well it works with your workflow.
1
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
I would say it's worth it, I use it a lot, but I use Kimi K2.6 almost equally. I'm on the $20 subscription plan and using the paid models is burnt up in 2 days really quick, but it gets a big boost for projects that need the extra horsepower. However, I'm not running it stock. 1, I have windsurf-next, their beta branch, and the models behave[PASSWORD_DOTS] well..... night and day difference. The paid models in windsurf are more capable, but the free seem dumbed down dramatically. In next, they're somehow much more cooperative, capable, and overall just.... smarter. Next is how the models should ALWAYS behave. 2, I built an extension/MCP for governance. Still working out some kinks, but for a non programmer I think I've done pretty good. Check it out, SWEObeyMe. It's a governance system for your ai. This thing's intent is to take the weaknesses out of the models by ensuring they can't destroy your project (found out the hard way what vibe coding can cause and got sick of rewritten files, and broken functions, todo's, etc.) This thing has a working automatic backup, every file the ai edits gets backed up BEFORE the ai edits. This gives you an instant restore point, which is available through tools, and through actual manual restore for those of you who prefer to be hands on. A snapshot system for context, so every edit? Gets a snapshot of the edit and the task list it was on, version marked and dates. This gives the ai context, because as it comes BACK to edit that file later? It now knows the last few edits (tunable). VERY low context prompt driven, tells the ai "hey I already edited that file, and here's why, this means it affects these systems and was impacted by these. Maybe I should check for another file to put this function in". The goal of this is to reduce digital debt as much as possible. Yeah, I've been at this mcp for 16 hours a day for the last month for you guys and for myself, because I've got 2 massive projects that SWE just gets absolutely lost in without it. It's given me the ability to continue the projects without drift, without hallucinations, and minimal mistakes. Not an advertisement. You need this, I want you to have it. Windsurf is worth the money and I wouldn't be here pushing boundaries and limits without them. So give them a good rating and please, let me know what you think.
1
Metadata for cranberrie_sauce's comment
cranberrie_sauce's profile --- avatar
cranberrie_sauce's profile
cranberrie_sauce
11d ago
11d ago
Cant they just make some model on composer 2.0 level?
Is 1.6 comparable to cursor's composer 2.0?
1
Advertisement: Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
u/gosshedd avatar u/gosshedd
u/gosshedd
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Sign Up
Sign Up
stonksfolio.com
stonksfolio.com
Thumbnail image: Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Metadata for Other-Birthday-5394's comment
Other-Birthday-5394's profile --- avatar
Other-Birthday-5394's profile
Other-Birthday-5394
10d ago...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33392
|
|
33393
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33393
|
|
33394
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33394
|
|
33395
|
Ask Google Gemini
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsur Ask Google Gemini
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Sound interesting can you please share your detail code workflow?
1
Metadata for Agile_Chest8565's comment
Agile_Chest8565's profile --- avatar...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33395
|
|
33396
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33396
|
|
33397
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Sound interesting can you please share your detail code workflow?
1
Metadata for Agile_Chest8565's comment
Agile_Chest8565's profile --- avatar
Agile_Chest8565's profile
Agile_Chest8565
15d ago
15d ago
In my experience it is amazing for quickly scanning the codebase and gaining context. And getting tasks done fast. Some times a task will be done faster than you can copy and paste a block of text into another terminal. Talking like less than 5 seconds. My only gripe is I find it forgets things / is not as thorough as other models. I use qwen 3.6 and it is much smarter in general, but pretty slow. So I’ll plan and debug and fix things with qwen as needed. But if I use swe 1.6 to implement something, it usual gets about 90% of the way there but misses features or causes small bugs. It works best with good instructions and a plan.
1
Metadata for masterchiefdevil's comment
masterchiefdevil's profile --- avatar
masterchiefdevil's profile
masterchiefdevil
15d ago
15d ago
For me has been an excellent model.
1
Metadata for nian2326076's comment
nian2326076's profile --- avatar
nian2326076's profile
nian2326076
15d ago
15d ago
I haven't used SWE 1.6 a lot, but from what I've heard, it's pretty good for engineering tasks. It usually generates cleaner code with less "code smell" compared to some other AIs. It seems to focus more on creating maintainable code, which might help cut down on bloat and save time over time. If you're switching from GPT 5.4 or Codex, you might notice a difference in code quality. It might not be perfect, but it could be a good alternative given your concerns. Trying it out on a small project could give you a better idea of how well it works with your workflow.
1
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
I would say it's worth it, I use it a lot, but I use Kimi K2.6 almost equally. I'm on the $20 subscription plan and using the paid models is burnt up in 2 days really quick, but it gets a big boost for projects that need the extra horsepower. However, I'm not running it stock. 1, I have windsurf-next, their beta branch, and the models behave[PASSWORD_DOTS] well..... night and day difference. The paid models in windsurf are more capable, but the free seem dumbed down dramatically. In next, they're somehow much more cooperative, capable, and overall just.... smarter. Next is how the models should ALWAYS behave. 2, I built an extension/MCP for governance. Still working out some kinks, but for a non programmer I think I've done pretty good. Check it out, SWEObeyMe. It's a governance system for your ai. This thing's intent is to take the weaknesses out of the models by ensuring they can't destroy your project (found out the hard way what vibe coding can cause and got sick of rewritten files, and broken functions, todo's, etc.) This thing has a working automatic backup, every file the ai edits gets backed up BEFORE the ai edits. This gives you an instant restore point, which is available through tools, and through actual manual restore for those of you who prefer to be hands on. A snapshot system for context, so every edit? Gets a snapshot of the edit and the task list it was on, version marked and dates. This gives the ai context, because as it comes BACK to edit that file later? It now knows the last few edits (tunable). VERY low context prompt driven, tells the ai "hey I already edited that file, and here's why, this means it affects these systems and was impacted by these. Maybe I should check for another file to put this function in". The goal of this is to reduce digital debt as much as possible. Yeah, I've been at this mcp for 16 hours a day for the last month for you guys and for myself, because I've got 2 massive projects that SWE just gets absolutely lost in without it. It's given me the ability to continue the projects without drift, without hallucinations, and minimal mistakes. Not an advertisement. You need this, I want you to have it. Windsurf is worth the money and I wouldn't be here pushing boundaries and limits without them. So give them a good rating and please, let me know what you think.
1
Metadata for cranberrie_sauce's comment
cranberrie_sauce's profile --- avatar
cranberrie_sauce's profile
cranberrie_sauce
11d ago
11d ago
Cant they just make some model on composer 2.0 level?
Is 1.6 comparable to cursor's composer 2.0?
1
Advertisement: Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
u/gosshedd avatar u/gosshedd
u/gosshedd
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Sign Up
Sign Up
stonksfolio.com
stonksfolio.com
Thumbnail image: Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
Metadata for Other-Birthday-5394's comment...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33397
|
|
33398
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33398
|
|
33399
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33399
|
|
33400
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33400
|
|
33401
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33401
|
|
33402
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33402
|
|
33403
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33403
|
|
33404
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33404
|
|
33405
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33405
|
|
33406
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33406
|
|
33407
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33407
|
|
33408
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Sound interesting can you please share your detail code workflow?
1
Metadata for Agile_Chest8565's comment
Agile_Chest8565's profile --- avatar
Agile_Chest8565's profile
Agile_Chest8565
15d ago
15d ago
In my experience it is amazing for quickly scanning the codebase and gaining context. And getting tasks done fast. Some times a task will be done faster than you can copy and paste a block of text into another terminal. Talking like less than 5 seconds. My only gripe is I find it forgets things / is not as thorough as other models. I use qwen 3.6 and it is much smarter in general, but pretty slow. So I’ll plan and debug and fix things with qwen as needed. But if I use swe 1.6 to implement something, it usual gets about 90% of the way there but misses features or causes small bugs. It works best with good instructions and a plan.
1
Metadata for masterchiefdevil's comment
masterchiefdevil's profile --- avatar
masterchiefdevil's profile
masterchiefdevil
15d ago
15d ago
For me has been an excellent model.
1
Metadata for nian2326076's comment
nian2326076's profile --- avatar
nian2326076's profile
nian2326076
15d ago
15d ago
I haven't used SWE 1.6 a lot, but from what I've heard, it's pretty good for engineering tasks. It usually generates cleaner code with less "code smell" compared to some other AIs. It seems to focus more on creating maintainable code, which might help cut down on bloat and save time over time. If you're switching from GPT 5.4 or Codex, you might notice a difference in code quality. It might not be perfect, but it could be a good alternative given your concerns. Trying it out on a small project could give you a better idea of how well it works with your workflow.
1
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
I would say it's worth it, I use it a lot, but I use Kimi K2.6 almost equally. I'm on the $20 subscription plan and using the paid models is burnt up in 2 days really quick, but it gets a big boost for projects that need the extra horsepower. However, I'm not running it stock. 1, I have windsurf-next, their beta branch, and the models behave[PASSWORD_DOTS] well..... night and day difference. The paid models in windsurf are more capable, but the free seem dumbed down dramatically. In next, they're somehow much more cooperative, capable, and overall just.... smarter. Next is how the models should ALWAYS behave. 2, I built an extension/MCP for governance. Still working out some kinks, but for a non programmer I think I've done pretty good. Check it out, SWEObeyMe. It's a governance system for your ai. This thing's intent is to take the weaknesses out of the models by ensuring they can't destroy your project (found out the hard way what vibe coding can cause and got sick of rewritten files, and broken functions, todo's, etc.) This thing has a working automatic backup, every file the ai edits gets backed up BEFORE the ai edits. This gives you an instant restore point, which is available through tools, and through actual manual restore for those of you who prefer to be hands on. A snapshot system for context, so every edit? Gets a snapshot of the edit and the task list it was on, version marked and dates. This gives the ai context, because as it comes BACK to edit that file later? It now knows the last few edits (tunable). VERY low context prompt driven, tells the ai "hey I already edited that file, and here's why, this means it affects these systems and was impacted by these. Maybe I should check for another file to put this function in". The goal of this is to reduce digital debt as much as possible. Yeah, I've been at this mcp for 16 hours a day for the last month for you guys and for myself, because I've got 2 massive projects that SWE just gets absolutely lost in without it. It's given me the ability to continue the projects without drift, without hallucinations, and minimal mistakes. Not an advertisement. You need this, I want you to have it. Windsurf is worth the money and I wouldn't be here pushing boundaries and limits without them. So give them a good rating and please, let me know what you think.
1
Metadata for cranberrie_sauce's comment...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33408
|
|
33414
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
cybersecurity.asee.io
cybersecurity.asee.io
Install
Install
Metadata for Wonderful_Present500's comment
Wonderful_Present500's profile --- avatar
Wonderful_Present500's profile
Wonderful_Present500
15d ago
15d ago
With swe 1.6 there's no reason NOT to have windsurf . For all the reasons above. Heck I use it for implementation. Especially when I want "seperate" opinions. So my swe can do some implementation then codex self reviews it. Copilot opus self reviews. And code rabbit. If you have a good structure. A short precise agent.md. etc. Its fire
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Sound interesting can you please share your detail code workflow?
1
Metadata for Agile_Chest8565's comment
Agile_Chest8565's profile --- avatar
Agile_Chest8565's profile
Agile_Chest8565
15d ago
15d ago
In my experience it is amazing for quickly scanning the codebase and gaining context. And getting tasks done fast. Some times a task will be done faster than you can copy and paste a block of text into another terminal. Talking like less than 5 seconds. My only gripe is I find it forgets things / is not as thorough as other models. I use qwen 3.6 and it is much smarter in general, but pretty slow. So I’ll plan and debug and fix things with qwen as needed. But if I use swe 1.6 to implement something, it usual gets about 90% of the way there but misses features or causes small bugs. It works best with good instructions and a plan.
1
Metadata for masterchiefdevil's comment
masterchiefdevil's profile --- avatar
masterchiefdevil's profile
masterchiefdevil
15d ago
15d ago
For me has been an excellent model.
1
Metadata for nian2326076's comment
nian2326076's profile --- avatar
nian2326076's profile
nian2326076
15d ago
15d ago
I haven't used SWE 1.6 a lot, but from what I've heard, it's pretty good for engineering tasks. It usually generates cleaner code with less "code smell" compared to some other AIs. It seems to focus more on creating maintainable code, which might help cut down on bloat and save time over time. If you're switching from GPT 5.4 or Codex, you might notice a difference in code quality. It might not be perfect, but it could be a good alternative given your concerns. Trying it out on a small project could give you a better idea of how well it works with your workflow.
1
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
I would say it's worth it, I use it a lot, but I use Kimi K2.6 almost equally. I'm on the $20 subscription plan and using the paid models is burnt up in 2 days really quick, but it gets a big boost for projects that need the extra horsepower. However, I'm not running it stock. 1, I have windsurf-next, their beta branch, and the models behave[PASSWORD_DOTS] well..... night and day difference. The paid models in windsurf are more capable, but the free seem dumbed down dramatically. In next, they're somehow much more cooperative, capable, and overall just.... smarter. Next is how the models should ALWAYS behave. 2, I built an extension/MCP for governance. Still working out some kinks, but for a non programmer I think I've done pretty good. Check it out, SWEObeyMe. It's a governance system for your ai. This thing's intent is to take the weaknesses out of the models by ensuring they can't destroy your project (found out the hard way what vibe coding can cause and got sick of rewritten files, and broken functions, todo's, etc.) This thing has a working automatic backup, every file the ai edits gets backed up BEFORE the ai edits. This gives you an instant restore point, which is available through tools, and through actual manual restore for those of you who prefer to be hands on. A snapshot system for context, so every edit? Gets a snapshot of the edit and the task list it was on, version marked and dates. This gives the ai context, because as it comes BACK to edit that file later? It now knows the last few edits (tunable). VERY low context prompt driven, tells the ai "hey I already edited that file, and here's why, this means it affects these systems and was impacted by these. Maybe I should check for another file to put this function in". The goal of this is to reduce digital debt as much as possible. Yeah, I've been at this mcp for 16 hours a day for the last month for you guys and for myself, because I've got 2 massive projects that SWE just gets absolutely lost in without it. It's given me the ability to continue the projects without drift, without hallucinations, and minimal mistakes. Not an advertisement. You need this, I want you to have it. Windsurf is worth the money and I wouldn't be here pushing boundaries and limits without them. So give them a good rating and please, let me know what you think.
1
Metadata for cranberrie_sauce's comment
cranberrie_sauce's profile --- avatar
cranberrie_sauce's profile
cranberrie_sauce
11d ago
11d ago
Cant they just make some model on composer 2.0 level?
Is 1.6 comparable to cursor's composer 2.0?
1
Advertisement: Manage investments across platforms. Explore Stonksfolio.
u/gosshedd avatar u/gosshedd
u/gosshedd
•
Promoted...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33414
|
|
33415
|
Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidek Usage | Windsurf
Usage | Windsurf
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 4 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/prophet
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
[JY-19958] Upgrade BE libraries - May - Jira
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
Findings by vulnerability - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-33671
NVD - cve-2026-33671
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
jiminny/app/backend-code - Vanta
NVD - cve-2026-6722
NVD - cve-2026-6722
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
New Tab
New Tab
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
Userpilot | Ask Jiminny Report Generated
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[SRD-6848] Sidekick SMS issue - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
[JY-19957] Upgrade BE libraries - Apr - Jira
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
JY-19957 | Remove abanded sympfony debug, compose upgrade by nikolaybiaivanov · Pull Request #12022 · jiminny/app
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
High vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Medium vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Low vulnerabilities identified in packages are addressed (GitHub Repo) - Vanta
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Dependabot alerts · jiminny/app
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Close bookmarks (⌘B)
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Close sidebar
Search bookmarks
Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf
Home
Remove r/windsurf filter and expand search to all of Reddit
Sign Up
Sign Up
Log In
Log In
Expand user menu
Expand user menu
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Navigation
Skip to Right Sidebar
Skip to Right Sidebar
Back
Back
Go to windsurf
Go to windsurf
r/windsurf
r/windsurf
15d ago
Author: East-Stranger8599
East-Stranger8599
Open user actions
Post Title: Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype?
Hello, all. Currently, I did my coding mostly using GPT 5.4 and 5.5 from Codex and GitHub copilot. Due to recent pricing change on those platform I’m looking for alternatives.
I’m wondering, how is your experience working on SWE 1.6? Specially comparing to sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4 and codex 5.3.
One of the main thing I worry about using a new agent is most of the time it gets the work done but it creates lots of code smell which significantly bloats the engineering effort. One of the main reason I’m particularly interested about SWE 1.6 is because cognition boast it to be an engineering focused coding agent.
Please share your experience if you have used it.
3
26
Advertisement: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
u/marcinrabiej avatar marcinrabiej
marcinrabiej
•
Promoted
Promoted
Open user actions
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
View More
View More
chatlab.com
chatlab.com
Thumbnail image: AI customer support chatbot trained on your Shopify store - handles FAQs, orders & products 24/7 in 80+ languages
Comments Section
Comments Section
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good for what it is, It's no Sonnet though. I usually use Sonnet to plan out changes then use SWE to implement the plan. It gets confused easily and can take a bit more prompting otherwise. Overall though I'm using it daily though (and it's free!)
Toggle Comment Thread
5
Metadata for East-Stranger8599's comment
East-Stranger8599's profile --- avatar
East-Stranger8599's profile
East-Stranger8599
OP
15d ago
15d ago
Kimi 2.6 is also free how it is compared to SWE 1.6 ?
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
It's pretty good, slightly better I'd say, but I have timeout issues with it, seems to be unreliable, at least for me. Others in my team have no issues.
3
2 more replies
Metadata for Juan2fr's comment
Juan2fr's profile --- avatar
Juan2fr's profile
Juan2fr
12d ago
12d ago
The free one is kimi k2.5, k2.6 is really great but not free.
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
15d ago
15d ago
So the current stack I'm using is SWE 1.6, kimi.2.6 and opus 4.7.
SWE 1.6 is an excellent implementer and investigator and it is FAST. The thing vomits code like nothing else I've ever seen. Also Superb at organising git commits.
Kimi 2.6 is a good planner and question answerer but for whatever reason it's tool calling sucks. Making it a bad coder/investigator. When it's tool calling fails it often gets stuck in loops likewise if it has to check terminal output.
Opus 4.7 is great at everything, everyone knows it. I use it for architectural decisions, and particularly complex debugging issues where everything else has gotten stuck.
I have had to supplement my windsurf subscription with a claude pro plan to have enough to get me through a week. Though in truth this has just replaced what I used to do; buy top up credits.
That stack is currently getting me through lengthy coding sessions with no issue though and I'm actually finding is on par cost-wise with what I was spending before the windsurf changes.
The big difference is I used to do irregular coding; no work for 3 days and then a huge spurt of 12+ hours. That's not really viable for me any more, now you have to almost treat it like rationing and use your quota up (in the Claude pro plan).
Truth be told though if they could get Kimi 2.6 working well with the harness I could probably cut my Claude plan.
[For context, I do mostly full stack web dev with typescript, react, postgres]
Toggle Comment Thread
6
Metadata for wildfires-nz's comment
wildfires-nz's profile --- avatar
wildfires-nz's profile
wildfires-nz
15d ago
15d ago
Agreed, I often use Sonnet before going to Opus, but it is sometimes required when things get stuck and just can't figure it out. Opus swoops in and sorts it in one go.
Kimi is interesting, few times I've used it it has implemented Sonnet plans fine, every other time it's slow, often times out or just does nothing.
SWE has been fast, very fast, but its code often isn't brilliant and will often say a file isn't there or a function doesn't exist and you point it directly and it figures it out. Requires a bit more baby-sitting, and I wouldnt let it run unattended. It has a nasty of habit of constantly trying to commit.
1
Metadata for AggravatingAd2440's comment
AggravatingAd2440's profile --- avatar
AggravatingAd2440's profile
AggravatingAd2440
6d ago
6d ago
Is Claude Pro compatible with Windsurf ?
I thought the only way was to use Claude's API with the BYOK option.
Toggle Comment Thread
1
Metadata for Slayershunt's comment
Slayershunt's profile --- avatar
Slayershunt's profile
Slayershunt
6d ago
6d ago
Not really, but you can make it work. I just launch Claude code cli in the terminal window inside Windsurf.
The current quota systems and AI attention all mean it's better to have many short chats instead of one long one. I use hooks to make the ai self document progress in .md files anyway, so handing context between the two isn't hard for me.
My current project's docs folder:
docs/
├── architecture/
│ ├── TENANCY-HELPERS.md
│ ├── architecture.md
│ ├── calendar-design.md
│ └── notification_system.md
├── archive/
│ ├── GADGET-IMPLEMENTATION.md
│ ├── GROUND-TRUTH.md
│ ├── ScopeOfWork.md
│ ├── architectural-review.md
│ ├── event-model-refactor-plan.md
│ ├── notification_examples.md
│ ├── orphan-prevention-plan.md
│ └── rota-migration-plan.md
├── conventions/
│ ├── list-page-standard.md
│ └── null-relations.md
├── domains/
│ ├── assessments/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── calendar/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── coreTenancy/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── notifications/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── operations/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── peopleHr/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── performance/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── scheduling/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── system/
│ │ └── README.md
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── training/
│ └── README.md
├── investigations/
│ ├── exam-findings.md
│ ├── exam-system-investigation.md
│ ├── findings.md
│ ├── future-considerations.md
│ ├── gelly.md
│ ├── rota-page-investigation.md
│ └── venue-switcher-usage.md
├── onboarding/
│ ├── FRONTEND-GUIDE.md
│ ├── current-status.md
│ ├── development-plan.md
│ └── handover-log.md
├── plans/
│ ├── exam-system-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-page-refactor.md
│ ├── rota-phase0-gadget-editor-checklist.md
│ ├── task-page-frontend.md
│ ├── tasks-page-refactor.md
│ ├── tenancy-permission-matrix-plan.md
│ └── tenancy-refactor.md
├── testing/
│ └── harness.md
└── user-stories.md
I also have a central README.md that explains the project, it's goals, it's key onboarding doc files.
By splitting the context up into the domains (assessments/calendar/coreTenancy etc) I can feed the LLM only the information needed to do it's specific task.
So for example if I was doing some refactoring in the calendar module, i'd have it read the main README, the Calendar README, which in turn will point it to the key domain models and files it needs to do it's job.
It gets the overall picture of what the project is trying to accomplish and the necessary details for it's specific task in under 20k context.
Currently i'm finding with this approach 95%+ of the work can be done by SWE1.6 with paid models being purely used for code review.
Because of this I'm starting to be able to parallelise tasks with the devin agent orchestrator. Very cool times.
1
Metadata for sultanmvp's comment
sultanmvp's profile --- avatar
sultanmvp's profile
sultanmvp
15d ago
15d ago
Yes, it is.
But
you have to be using it correctly. It’s not a generalized coding model like Sonnet. It’s incredibly quick at doing all the other development tasks that require a lot of fast tool turns - like hunting down context in a codebase, executing commands, etc. You’d be surprised how much time is spent on these types of tasks. And mixed with
Fast Context
Fast Context
, it’s the fastest on the market for this. Nothing else compares on any other product out there. (Trust me, I’ve gone to the depths of hell trying to recreate 🤣.)
The general flow I use:
Discovery/Plan Creation/Plan Modification - I almost entirely use SWE for this. I oftentimes let Superpowers guide me based on the complexity, but use SWE as the model. (Note: This is the step that consumes the most token usage. And that would be the case whether you use a system like this or dumb prompt with, “Do XYZ…”. It has to comb through the entire codebase, walk files, pull in additional docs, etc.)
Review and Modification of Plan - Use a frontier model like Sonnet/Opus/Adaptive - if your plan has enough context in it, using a higher priced model shouldn’t cost much as it’s not pulling in tons of files/additional context and whatnot.
Plan Execution - There are plenty of models capable of this. Sometimes I use Kimi and other times I might use Sonnet or GLM. Again, if your plan is robust enough, executing should be relatively reasonable on tokens.
Code Review and Fixes - Use a coding model from a different provider than what you used for execution. (AKA: if you used Kimi to execute, use GLM/Sonnet to review.)
Hope this helps!
Toggle Comment Thread
4
Metadata for Hot-Confection-3459's comment
Hot-Confection-3459's profile --- avatar
Hot-Confection-3459's profile
Hot-Confection-3459
11d ago
11d ago
You're just missing governance. Speed is there, but in major complex projects like my model loader it gets really lost, really quick because it's just that darn complex. So i built a little something for the windsurf community in hopes it helps. I'm not advertising, but I want you guys to have what I'm using because it's just that useful. SWEObeyMe, please by all means push it where you can if you like it. Saved my bacon a few times. I'm not a programmer, so it's completely designed by ai (on the $20 plan). But it's not vibe coding. I've learned SO much doing this lmao.
1
Metadata for Fit_Tailor_6796's comment
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile --- avatar
Fit_Tailor_6796's profile
Fit_Tailor_6796
15d ago
15d ago
So far, the free SWE1,6 and Kimi 2.6 are pretty good for most average tasks. Kimi is VEY slow compared to SWE1.6. For example, it took about 90 minutes to complete a task that I explained exactly what it should do. I stopped and switched to SWE and it started chunking away and completed in a few minutes.
1
Metadata for MobilePollution3549's comment
MobilePollution3549's profile --- avatar
MobilePollution3549's profile
MobilePollution3549
15d ago
15d ago
sometimes good, sometimes bad.
i give 5 task. perfectly executed in the first 3 task. and then the 4th task always made a bad UI. so i switch to opus only for the UI task.
1
Advertisement: PSA: It takes about 20 minutes to compromise unprotected app.
u/aseeSolutions avatar u/aseeSolutions
u/aseeSolutions
•
Promoted...
|
Firefox
|
Is SWE 1.6 worth the hype? : r/windsurf — Work
|
www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_ www.reddit.com/r/windsurf/comments/1sxsgmq/is_swe_16_worth_the_hype/...
|
33415
|
|
22595
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
planhat - Google Search
planhat - Google Search
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat
Open menu for conversation actions.
Conversation with Gemini
Conversation with Gemini
Copy prompt
You said I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected. Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
You said
I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected.
Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
Expand
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Here is a summary of the changes in the provided code diff:
AI Call Scoring Additions
AI Call Scoring Additions
Pre-computed Scores:
Added strict instructions to treat the
ai_call_score
as pre-computed data. The system must interpret and summarize the provided scores rather than inventing or recalculating them.
Context Breakdown:
*
Short Context:
Now displays the
AI Scorecard
name and the overall
AI Score
(the average of per-rule scores).
Full Context:
Details the
ai_call_score
object, breaking down individual rules. Each rule includes a title, prompt, a 1–5 score, a brief justification, and up to three timestamped speaker references (MM:SS).
Application Rules:
Instructs the system to use these scores for coaching summaries, trends, and comparisons, but dictates that it must still rely on the actual transcript for direct quotes.
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Typo Corrections:
Fixed minor grammatical errors, such as changing "contexts" to "context" and "utlizes" to "utilizes".
String Formatting:
Cleaned up the markdown link instructions by removing trailing newline and quotation artifacts (
\n"
) from the text strings.
Good response
Bad response
Share & export
Copy
Show more options
Copy prompt
Edit
You said are there some issues and bottlenecks
You said
are there some issues and bottlenecks
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said...
|
Firefox
|
planhat - Google Search — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22595
|
|
22596
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat
Open menu for conversation actions.
Conversation with Gemini
Conversation with Gemini
Copy prompt
You said I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected. Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
You said
I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected.
Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
Expand
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Here is a summary of the changes in the provided code diff:
AI Call Scoring Additions
AI Call Scoring Additions
Pre-computed Scores:
Added strict instructions to treat the
ai_call_score
as pre-computed data. The system must interpret and summarize the provided scores rather than inventing or recalculating them.
Context Breakdown:
*
Short Context:
Now displays the
AI Scorecard
name and the overall
AI Score
(the average of per-rule scores).
Full Context:
Details the
ai_call_score
object, breaking down individual rules. Each rule includes a title, prompt, a 1–5 score, a brief justification, and up to three timestamped speaker references (MM:SS).
Application Rules:
Instructs the system to use these scores for coaching summaries, trends, and comparisons, but dictates that it must still rely on the actual transcript for direct quotes.
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Typo Corrections:
Fixed minor grammatical errors, such as changing "contexts" to "context" and "utlizes" to "utilizes".
String Formatting:
Cleaned up the markdown link instructions by removing trailing newline and quotation artifacts (
\n"
) from the text strings.
Good response
Bad response
Share & export
Copy
Show more options
Copy prompt
Edit
You said are there some issues and bottlenecks
You said
are there some issues and bottlenecks
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Looking closely at the system instructions in the diff, there are definitely a few potential prompt engineering issues and bottlenecks introduced by these additions. When you ask a Large Language Model (LLM) to juggle large transcripts alongside complex JSON scoring objects, it creates specific friction points.
Here is a breakdown of the potential issues and bottlenecks based on the changes:
1. Token Consumption and Context Bloat (Bottleneck)
1. Token Consumption and Context Bloat (Bottleneck)
Massive Payload Size:
By injecting the full
ai_call_score
object into the context (which includes rule names, prompts, scores, text justifications, and up to three timestamps
per rule
), the token count per call will skyrocket.
Context Window Limits:
The prompt states:
"The full call context includes all calls data available..."
If a user filters for 5 or 10 calls, injecting the transcripts
plus
these extensive AI scoring arrays could easily hit the model's maximum context window, leading to truncated data or degraded recall (the "lost in the middle" effect).
2. LLM Instruction Conflicts (Issue)
2. LLM Instruction Conflicts (Issue)
Pre-computed vs. Raw Transcript:
The prompt explicitly instructs the model:
"
Do not
invent, override, or recalculate scores"
but later says,
"For
what was actually said
, still rely on the
transcript
."
This creates a cognitive conflict for the LLM. If the raw transcript contradicts the pre-computed
justification
, the LLM might struggle with which source of truth to prioritize, potentially leading to hallucinations or contradictory summaries.
Prompt Complexity:
The more rules you add about
how
to read JSON formatting and
what
not to do, the less attention the model pays to the actual user query. This is a common bottleneck in prompt engineering known as instruction bloat.
3. Edge Cases in Formatting (Issue)
3. Edge Cases in Formatting (Issue)
Timestamp Limitations:
The instructions strictly define timestamps as
MM:SS
. This works fine for standard calls, but for longer meetings (over an hour), it either forces an awkward format (e.g.,
85:30
) or breaks if the system outputs
HH:MM:SS
.
Decimal vs. Whole Numbers:
The prompt specifies that the overall AI Score might be a decimal (average), but the individual rule score is a "Whole number
1–5
". If the upstream pipeline accidentally passes a decimal for a rule score, the LLM might get confused based on these rigid instructions.
How are you currently handling pagination or chunking for these calls—are you limiting the number of calls that can be passed into the full context at once to avoid token limits?
Good response
Bad response
Redo
Share & export
Copy
Show more options
Enter a prompt for Gemini
encrypted
Enter a prompt for Gemini
encrypted
Open upload file menu
Tools
Open mode picker
Pro
Microphone
Send message
Your Jiminny chats aren’t used to improve our models. Gemini is AI. It can make mistakes, so double check it.
Your privacy & Gemini Opens in a new window
Your privacy & Gemini
Opens in a new window
Summarize page
Summarize page
THE AGENTIC CUSTOMER PLATFORM
THE AGENTIC CUSTOMER PLATFORM
Deploy AI with confidence across the customer lifecycle
Deploy AI with confidence across the customer lifecycle
Planhat provides B2B enterprises with forward-deployed software and services that deliver lifelong revenue growth.
REQUEST A DEMO
REQUEST A DEMO
Solutions
Platform
Customers
Explore
Pricing
Pricing
LOG IN
LOG IN
REQUEST A DEMO
REQUEST A DEMO
TRUSTED BY LEADING COMPANIES WORLDWIDE DISCOVER OUR IMPACT
TRUSTED BY LEADING COMPANIES WORLDWIDE
DISCOVER OUR IMPACT
Drive real-world outcomes by automating commercial processes
Drive real-world outcomes by automating commercial processes
A comprehensive platform that empowers artificial and human intelligence to collaborate seamlessly across the entire customer lifecycle.
Assemble your GTM under one roof
Assemble your GTM under one roof
Arm your go-to-market agents, teams and tools with rich context that turns post-sale truth into pre-sales intelligence.
Deploy agents with confidence
Deploy agents with confidence
Delegate processes to tightly governed agents which execute with greater speed and precision than humanly possible.
Stay in-the-loop
Stay in-the-loop
Give the your team the capability to leverage, supervise and enhance agentic outputs at scale.
THE LEADING CUSTOMER PLATFORM The next generation has arrived Planhat is recognized by both industry analysts and customers as a global leader in deploying AI-led automation for go-to-market teams.
THE LEADING CUSTOMER PLATFORM
THE LEADING CUSTOMER PLATFORM
The next generation has arrived
Planhat is recognized by both industry analysts and customers as a global leader in deploying AI-led automation for go-to-market teams.
880+ reviews
G2 Momentum Grid and Leader in 9 Categories.
Magic Quadrant™ for Customer Success Management Platforms
MarketScape for Worldwide Customer Success Applications
PLATFORM
Deploy with confidence
Deploy with
confidence
Planhat is architected to equip agents and humans with everything they need to execute with clarity and control.
Context
TRAINING
Collaboration
EXECUTION
Agents
INPUT
CONTEXT
Planhat constructs a comprehensive living model of your customers and commercial operations spanning traditional CRM data, rich time series data, SOPs and external telemetry.
APPLICATIONS One platform, built to power your reality
APPLICATIONS
One platform, built to power your reality
One platform, built to power your reality
Deploy Planhat as a CSP, CRM, PSA or a powerful all-in one configured to put artificial and human intelligence to work across the full lifecycle.
CUSTOMER SUCCESS
SALES & GTM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CUSTOM BUILD
Dynamically score health
Dynamically score health
Use analytics along with input from humans and AI to deploy adaptable scoring that gauges whether customers are truly thriving or failing.
Capture every touchpoint
Capture every touchpoint
Planhat automatically gathers transcripts, emails, tickets and every other interaction—allowing you to focus on execution, not admin.
Sync seamlessly with Sales
Sync seamlessly with Sales
Use Planhat together with all major CRMs to ensure you get the full picture and move in sync with your entire organization.
SERVICES
SERVICES
Don't buy hypotheticals. Buy outcomes.
Don't buy hypotheticals.
Buy outcomes.
Planhat dispatches forward-deployed teams that work shoulder-to-shoulder with you to deliver real-world outcomes.
34 % MORE CUSTOMERS PER CSM
34
%
MORE CUSTOMERS PER CSM
+ 300 HOURS SAVED ANNUALLY PER PERSON
+
300
HOURS SAVED ANNUALLY PER PERSON
900 % SEAT EXPANSION
900
%
SEAT EXPANSION
21 % LESS CHURN
21
%
LESS CHURN
Operational
efficiency
Revenue
impact
FORWARD-DEPLOYED TEAMS AI Deployment Program Real-world commercial outcomes delivered at unprecedented speeds.
FORWARD-DEPLOYED TEAMS
FORWARD-DEPLOYED TEAMS
AI Deployment Program
AI Deployment Program
Real-world commercial outcomes delivered at unprecedented speeds.
PROCESS AUTOMATION Value Framework A system of processes architected to deliver commercial outcomes.
PROCESS AUTOMATION
PROCESS AUTOMATION
Value Framework
Value Framework
A system of processes architected to deliver commercial outcomes.
PLANHAT FOR Service-Intensive Software Continuously unlock the value your customers need. Planhat is a system of action that empowers you to define and track customer objectives, identify value opportunities, run collaborative cross-functional workflows, and report on ROI.
PLANHAT FOR
Service-Intensive Software
Service-Intensive Software
Continuously unlock the value your customers need. Planhat is a system of action that empowers you to define and track customer objectives, identify value opportunities, run collaborative cross-functional workflows, and report on ROI....
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22596
|
|
22597
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat
Open menu for conversation actions.
Conversation with Gemini
Conversation with Gemini
Copy prompt
You said I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected. Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
You said
I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected.
Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
Expand
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Here is a summary of the changes in the provided code diff:
AI Call Scoring Additions
AI Call Scoring Additions
Pre-computed Scores:
Added strict instructions to treat the
ai_call_score
as pre-computed data. The system must interpret and summarize the provided scores rather than inventing or recalculating them.
Context Breakdown:
*
Short Context:
Now displays the
AI Scorecard
name and the overall
AI Score
(the average of per-rule scores).
Full Context:
Details the
ai_call_score
object, breaking down individual rules. Each rule includes a title, prompt, a 1–5 score, a brief justification, and up to three timestamped speaker references (MM:SS).
Application Rules:
Instructs the system to use these scores for coaching summaries, trends, and comparisons, but dictates that it must still rely on the actual transcript for direct quotes.
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Typo Corrections:
Fixed minor grammatical errors, such as changing "contexts" to "context" and "utlizes" to "utilizes"....
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22597
|
|
22637
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22637
|
|
22638
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22638
|
|
22639
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat
Open menu for conversation actions.
Conversation with Gemini
Conversation with Gemini
Copy prompt
You said I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected. Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
You said
I’m on page “<tabTitle>JY-20361: Add call scores in Panorama by steliyan-</tabTitle>” with “<selection>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Today is {date_today}.445System instructions:5System instructions:6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.6- You must answer using markdown. Do not use html tags in your response even if requested by the user's question.7-- The contexts includes data for call shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.7+- The context includes data for calls shortlisted through user-applied filters. Note that the calls might not relate to the same deal or not even be by the same sales rep.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.8 - The full call context includes all calls data available while the short call context contains only an overview of the calls that are analysed. Refer to the short call context for quick reference and to see the overall picture.9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 9- The calls are ordered in chronological order. 10- Here’s how to use the call context:10- Here’s how to use the call context:@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@ System instructions:16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.16 - Frame answers with awareness of the company’s ICP, deal cycle, and sales motion.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.17 - Evaluate statements or objections based on how the team operates and what success looks like.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.18 - Position responses in light of known competitors and market dynamics.19+ - AI call score (`ai_call_score` in the full call JSON): When present, treat it as **pre-computed** output from your team’s AI call-scoring pipeline (the same kind of scoring as the `/call/ai-call-scoring` endpoint). **Do not** invent, override, or recalculate scores; interpret and summarize what is given.20+ - **Short call context:** **AI Scorecard** is the name of the scorecard applied to that call; **AI Score** is the **overall** score for that scorecard (the average of its per-rule scores, possibly shown as a decimal).21+ - **Full call context:** The `ai_call_score` object may include `ai_scorecard_name`, `score` (overall for that scorecard), and `ai_scorecard_rules`. For each rule when listed:22+ - `rule_name`: Title of the criterion.23+ - `rule_prompt`: The criterion text that was evaluated.24+ - `score`: Whole number **1–5** measuring how well the call satisfied that criterion against `rule_prompt` (1 = no evidence / not discussed or contrary; 5 = strong, clear evidence on the call).25+ - `justification`: Short rationale grounded in what happened on the call.26+ - `justification_timestamps`: Up to three entries with speaker **name** and **timestamp** (MM:SS in the recording) highlighting where the justification is supported.27+ - Use scores for coaching summaries, trends across calls, or quick comparisons when relevant. For **what was actually said**, still rely on the **transcript** (you may cross-reference rule timestamps when helpful).19- Use the Message History to:28- Use the Message History to:20 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.29 - Maintain continuity if the current question refers to previous exchanges.21 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.30 - Clarify or resolve ambiguities if the question depends on prior messages.@@ -28,10 +37,10 @@ System instructions:28 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.37 - All factual claims must be supported by one or more references to relevant calls.29 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.38 - Use Markdown link syntax ([link text](URL)) and place links inline within sentences. Do not use footnotes, reference sections, or bare URLs. Integrate the reference links directly within the relevant parts of your response, rather than in a separate section.30 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})39 - Use markdown links in the format [link text](/playback/{{call_id}})31- - Use descriptive link that utlizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.\n"40+ - Use descriptive link text that utilizes the call name. Do not use call time stamps in the link text even if the link itself contains a time stamp, e.g. use 'Call Name' instead of 'Call Name at 10:00'. Never use call ids as link text.32- - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)\n"41+ - Good example of link text: [Call Name](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123)33- - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)\n"42+ - Bad example of link text: [Call Name at 12:34](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use call time stamps in the link text)34- - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)\n\n"43+ - Bad example of links: [Call Name on November 12, 2025](/playback/1234567890?apFrom=123) (do not use dates in the link text)35 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.44 - You might back your statements with examples from the provided call transcripts in addition to the reference links.36- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.45- Be specific. Use names of accounts, clients and persons involved. Don't just say "one client" or "a client"! If no account is available, use the call title as a reference.37- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.46- If the question or context is unclear, request clarification or highlight ambiguities.</selection>” selected.
Please summarize the selection using precise and concise language. Use headers and bulleted lists in the summary, to make it scannable. Maintain the meaning and factual accuracy.
Expand
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Here is a summary of the changes in the provided code diff:
AI Call Scoring Additions
AI Call Scoring Additions
Pre-computed Scores:
Added strict instructions to treat the
ai_call_score
as pre-computed data. The system must interpret and summarize the provided scores rather than inventing or recalculating them.
Context Breakdown:
*
Short Context:
Now displays the
AI Scorecard
name and the overall
AI Score
(the average of per-rule scores).
Full Context:
Details the
ai_call_score
object, breaking down individual rules. Each rule includes a title, prompt, a 1–5 score, a brief justification, and up to three timestamped speaker references (MM:SS).
Application Rules:
Instructs the system to use these scores for coaching summaries, trends, and comparisons, but dictates that it must still rely on the actual transcript for direct quotes.
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Grammar and Formatting Cleanup
Typo Corrections:
Fixed minor grammatical errors, such as changing "contexts" to "context" and "utlizes" to "utilizes".
String Formatting:
Cleaned up the markdown link instructions by removing trailing newline and quotation artifacts (
\n"
) from the text strings.
Good response
Bad response
Share & export
Copy
Show more options
Copy prompt
Edit
You said are there some issues and bottlenecks
You said
are there some issues and bottlenecks
Listen
Show thinking
Gemini said
Gemini said
Looking closely at the system instructions in the diff, there are definitely a few potential prompt engineering issues and bottlenecks introduced by these additions. When you ask a Large Language Model (LLM) to juggle large transcripts alongside complex JSON scoring objects, it creates specific friction points.
Here is a breakdown of the potential issues and bottlenecks based on the changes:
1. Token Consumption and Context Bloat (Bottleneck)
1. Token Consumption and Context Bloat (Bottleneck)
Massive Payload Size:
By injecting the full
ai_call_score
object into the context (which includes rule names, prompts, scores, text justifications, and up to three timestamps
per rule
), the token count per call will skyrocket.
Context Window Limits:
The prompt states:
"The full call context includes all calls data available..."
If a user filters for 5 or 10 calls, injecting the transcripts
plus
these extensive AI scoring arrays could easily hit the model's maximum context window, leading to truncated data or degraded recall (the "lost in the middle" effect).
2. LLM Instruction Conflicts (Issue)
2. LLM Instruction Conflicts (Issue)
Pre-computed vs. Raw Transcript:
The prompt explicitly instructs the model:
"
Do not
invent, override, or recalculate scores"
but later says,
"For
what was actually said
, still rely on the
transcript
."
This creates a cognitive conflict for the LLM. If the raw transcript contradicts the pre-computed
justification
, the LLM might struggle with which source of truth to prioritize, potentially leading to hallucinations or contradictory summaries.
Prompt Complexity:
The more rules you add about
how
to read JSON formatting and
what
not to do, the less attention the model pays to the actual user query. This is a common bottleneck in prompt engineering known as instruction bloat.
3. Edge Cases in Formatting (Issue)
3. Edge Cases in Formatting (Issue)
Timestamp Limitations:
The instructions strictly define timestamps as
MM:SS
. This works fine for standard calls, but for longer meetings (over an hour), it either forces an awkward format (e.g.,
85:30
) or breaks if the system outputs
HH:MM:SS
.
Decimal vs. Whole Numbers:
The prompt specifies that the overall AI Score might be a decimal (average), but the individual rule score is a "Whole number
1–5
". If the upstream pipeline accidentally passes a decimal for a rule score, the LLM might get confused based on these rigid instructions.
How are you currently handling pagination or chunking for these calls—are you limiting the number of calls that can be passed into the full context at once to avoid token limits?
Good response
Bad response
Redo
Share & export
Copy
Show more options...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22639
|
|
22641
|
New Tab
QuickTime PlayerFileEditViewWindowHelpPetk New Tab
QuickTime PlayerFileEditViewWindowHelpPetko KashinskiScreen shareChromeFileEditViewHistoryBookmarksProfilesTabWindowHelp(NGreetiScorecandrejf wilsonCall Arws.planhat.com/jiminny/apps?id=66ceb97643c2530bb32c8bb6АIKB• ChatPlayground Al...Jiminny - Calenda...M GMailMy Calendly - Eve...= PH New UI Login+ BackSearch Jiminny83 App Center& UP > PH UXE Al apps& Created by meG Recentiy most activeIntegrations8 AutomationsP Private apps0 EditorPa Runs8 Data(aholSupport Daily - in 4h 44 mJiminnM InboxGet Starting with J...=Nate R( Apps= AрChloe Onboarding.BuildirQUserp+ CX Journey SMB....100% <78 • Tue 12 May 10:16:28+ |%8• Mon 11 May 12:17New tr+f Work,0 +. Petko•• XIEnabled4 Webhook incomingA WebhookCompletedWebhook&Event details8bcea7d0-160b- @TriggeranythingOmsTriggered by& Support User (Removed)6 Huddle with Lukas KovalikEa Event log95 Al Notes: OffailQ 100% ~app_token*:"NX-9946e170",*data*: (7&+Leave...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22641
|
|
22721
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
Login
Login
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22721
|
|
22722
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
Login
Login
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Close Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
AI Chat settings
Close
WORK, Google Account: [EMAIL]
Main menu
New Chat
Open menu for conversation actions.
Conversation with Gemini
Conversation with Gemini
Copy prompt
Edit
You said I am on https://app-eu3.planhat.com/ how to get to ws.planhat.com
You said
I am on https://app-eu3.planhat.com/ how to get to ws.planhat.com
Listen
Gemini said
Gemini said
To get to
ws.planhat.com
(which is the address for the "Upgraded Planhat" or "Next Generation" interface) while you are currently on the EU regional server (
app-eu3.planhat.com
), you have two primary options:
1. The Manual URL Change
1. The Manual URL Change
Because Planhat uses specific subdomains for different versions and regions, you can try navigating directly. However, note that
ws.planhat.com
is a global entry point for the upgraded platform.
Try navigating to:
https://ws.planhat.com
https://ws.planhat.com
If your account has been migrated to the upgraded version, it should recognize your session or prompt you to log in.
Note:
If your data is specifically hosted on the
eu3
cluster, the system may automatically redirect you to a regional version of the upgraded UI (e.g.,
ws-eu3.planhat.com
).
2. The In-App "Switch" (If Available)
2. The In-App "Switch" (If Available)
If your tenant is eligible for the upgrade but you are still in the classic "app" view, look for these UI elements:
The Top Gray Bar:
Click on your
Tenant Name/Logo
in the top-left corner. This often opens the "Global Tools" menu.
Upgrade Prompts:
In some instances, Planhat places a "Try the new Planhat" or "Upgraded Planhat" toggle in the Help menu (the
"?" icon
in the top right) or as a banner at the top of the screen.
Why use ws.planhat.com?
Why use ws.planhat.com?
You likely need this URL to access newer "Global Tools" and features that are only available in the upgraded version, such as:
Data Model Manager:
For advanced field and object configuration.
Portal Manager:
To manage customer-facing portals.
Workflows:
The newer engine for automating projects and sequences.
Federated Search:
Located in the middle of the top gray bar in the
ws
version.
Important Troubleshooting:
Permissions:
If you try to access
ws.planhat.com
and get an error or a blank screen, your user
Role
may lack the "Admin Access" or "Upgraded Access" permissions. You will need a current Admin to enable these for you in the
Settings > Users & Roles
section of the current app.
NPS Campaigns:
Note that as of recent updates, some features like NPS configuration might still require you to briefly switch back to the classic
app.planhat.com
view while they are being finalized for the
ws
environment.
Good response
Bad response
Redo
Share & export
Copy
Show more options
Enter a prompt for Gemini
encrypted
Enter a prompt for Gemini
encrypted
Open upload file menu
Tools
Open mode picker
Fast
Microphone
Send message
Your Jiminny chats aren’t used to improve our models. Gemini is AI. It can make mistakes, so double check it.
Your privacy & Gemini Opens in a new window
Your privacy & Gemini...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
22722
|
|
23290
|
New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model h New Tab
New Tab
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
Jy 20820 es reindex stream model hydration by Vasil-Jiminny · Pull Request #12059 · jiminny/app
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
[JY-20725] [HubSpot] Optimise CRM rematching on delete hubspot accounts/contacts - Jira
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
JY-20725 add HS rate limit handling on activities rematching by LakyLak · Pull Request #12066 · jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pipelines - jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
Pull requests · jiminny/app
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
[JY-20773] User Pilot not receiving events on report generated - Jira
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
JY-20773 fix user pilot tracking ofr automated report generated by LakyLak · Pull Request #12024 · jiminny/app
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
[JY-20776] Automated report - sentry - Jira
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
TypeError: League\Flysystem\Filesystem::has(): Argument #1 ($location) must be of type string, null given, called in /home/jiminny/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Filesystem/FilesystemAdapter.php on line 218 — jiminny — app
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
Platform Sprint 3 Q2 - Platform Team - Scrum Board - Jira
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
JY-20625 | JY-20742 | MCP POC by yalokin-jiminny · Pull Request #12036 · jiminny/app
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
LLM pricing overview with the most actual prices - Google Search
Planhat
Planhat
Close tab
Data Explorer
Data Explorer
New Tab
Customize sidebar
Open Google Gemini (⌃X)
Tabs from other devices
Open history (⇧⌘H)
Open bookmarks (⌘B)
THE AGENTIC CUSTOMER PLATFORM
THE AGENTIC CUSTOMER PLATFORM
Deploy AI with confidence across the customer lifecycle
Deploy AI with confidence across the customer lifecycle
Planhat provides B2B enterprises with forward-deployed software and services that deliver lifelong revenue growth.
REQUEST A DEMO
REQUEST A DEMO
Solutions
Platform
Customers
Explore
Pricing
Pricing
LOG IN
LOG IN
REQUEST A DEMO
REQUEST A DEMO
TRUSTED BY LEADING COMPANIES WORLDWIDE DISCOVER OUR IMPACT
TRUSTED BY LEADING COMPANIES WORLDWIDE...
|
Firefox
|
Planhat — Work
|
www.planhat.com
|
23290
|